Before the First Shift: The Conversation Faculty, Preceptors, and Learners Need

Before the First Shift: The Conversation Faculty, Preceptors, and Learners Need

I have arrived for the first day of more than one senior preceptorship and realized that the preceptor was learning about the placement at almost the same time the learner was meeting them.

The information may have been sent ahead. The preceptor may not have seen it, may not have checked that email account, or may have arrived that morning without knowing they were assigned a learner. Meanwhile, report is happening. Patients need care. The nurse is trying to understand who this learner is while managing everything the shift already requires.

Someone needs to connect the pieces: the learner’s level, the purpose of the experience, the expectations for the placement, and the boundaries around supervision. As the faculty member, I introduce everyone and make sure the preceptor knows that the learner has my contact information. Concerns need to reach me early, while there is still time to address them. The learner also needs space to introduce themselves, explain what they have been learning, and name their goals for the shift.

These conversations rarely happen during a quiet, uninterrupted meeting. The packet may be explained between report, assessments, medications, and everything else waiting for the nurse. Sometimes the clinical day has already started before all three people have the same information. We may get only a few focused minutes while the unit continues moving around us. Those minutes can give faculty and the preceptor a starting point to clarify what each person is responsible for, what each person can see, and when they need to reconnect.

Faculty and Preceptors Are Doing Different Jobs

Faculty and preceptors both contribute to clinical education, but their roles are not interchangeable. Faculty understands the course, the learner’s place in the program, the evaluation criteria, and the school’s requirements. The preceptor understands the patient assignment, the unit workflow, the facility’s expectations, and what the learner is doing throughout the shift. Each person holds information the other one needs.

They may also work under different employers, policies, and access privileges. A faculty member may not have access to the electronic health record, medication-dispensing system, or other resources available to hospital employees. That varies by facility and agreement, but it matters. Faculty cannot step into every part of the employed nurse’s role, and the preceptor should not be expected to make academic decisions that belong to the school.

This is where confusion can begin. A preceptor may believe faculty should be completing more of the bedside teaching. Faculty may believe the preceptor received the course expectations and understands the learner’s current level. Both may be working hard and still have an incomplete picture of what the other person can reasonably do.

What Faculty Needs the Preceptor to Understand

A faculty member supervising a senior preceptorship may not be present for every shift. They may visit at the beginning and end of the placement, schedule a midpoint check-in, and remain available between visits. In a group clinical, the instructor may be on site while supervising several learners across more than one unit. Either way, faculty cannot witness every interaction between a learner and the nurse working with them.

That does not make faculty a distant name on an evaluation form. Faculty remains responsible for the academic side of the experience according to the program’s requirements and the clinical agreement. The educator needs to know how the learner is progressing, where they are struggling, and whether the placement is providing appropriate opportunities. That information has to come from the people who are present when the work is happening.

Specific observations are more useful than a label. “The learner lacks initiative” gives faculty very little to work with. “The learner waits for direction and has not started an assessment without prompting during the last three shifts” gives the educator something they can discuss, observe, and address. The same applies to communication, preparation, organization, and response to feedback.

Specific observations are more useful than a label.

Timing matters too. Faculty needs to hear about a concern while there is still time to intervene. Waiting until the final evaluation can turn a pattern that needed coaching into a surprise that affects the learner’s progression. Early communication does not require a formal complaint. It can begin with, “I am noticing something, and I want to make sure we address it before the next shift.”

What the Preceptor Needs From Faculty

The preceptor needs more than the learner’s name, a packet, and an evaluation form. They need a practical explanation of the learner’s level, the goals of the experience, what the learner has been prepared to do, and what requires supervision. They also need to know what information faculty expects from them and how to reach the educator when a question comes up.

In recent interviews with U.S. nurses who had precepted senior baccalaureate learners, participants identified faculty communication, clear expectations, learner scope, faculty presence, and ongoing support as factors that shaped how effective they felt in the role (Jenkins-Arraf, 2026). Preceptors across a broader body of research have also described the time demands of teaching, limited recognition, and a need for support (Benny et al., 2023). Those findings fit a practical limit most faculty already know: we cannot remove the preceptor’s patient assignment or control the pace of the unit. We can make sure the nurse is not left guessing about the academic side of the placement by answering questions, clarifying expectations, responding when concerns arise, and acknowledging the work that teaching adds to an already demanding shift.

The relationship also needs some flexibility. A nurse who starts the morning late, overwhelmed, or surprised by a learner may need a moment to regroup. Faculty can ask whether the pairing is workable, offer support, and involve the charge nurse when a change is needed. Respecting the nurse’s reality and advocating for the learner can happen in the same conversation.

Respecting the nurse’s reality and advocating for the learner can happen in the same conversation.

The Learner Has a Role in the Partnership

The learner should not be the only person carrying communication between the school and the clinical site. They still need to participate in the relationship. Introducing themselves, stating their current level, naming learning goals, and speaking honestly about what they have or have not performed are part of professional socialization.

A direct introduction can cover the learner’s program level, current learning, goals for the shift, prior supervised practice, and anything they have not yet performed. That gives the preceptor useful information without asking the learner to prove they deserve to be taught. The learner remains responsible for preparation, communication, feedback, safety, and working within scope. Faculty and the clinical partner remain responsible for providing the structure and supervision that allow the learner to do those things.

The Conversation Before the Shift

Use the opening conversation for the information that will shape today’s working relationship. The full packet and policy review still matter, but the nurse needs to know who this learner is, what the experience requires, and how to reach faculty while the shift is underway.

Faculty can begin with a direct introduction:

A Faculty Introduction

“I am __________, and I am the faculty member for this placement. This learner is in the __________ level of the program. The main goals for this experience are __________. The learner has my number, and I need concerns to reach me early. I will be checking in __________.”

The preceptor can clarify what the shift looks like, where the learner’s goals may fit, and how they prefer routine questions to be handled. This is also the time to identify a mismatch. The learner may have a goal that is not realistic for the current assignment, or the preceptor may be expecting independence beyond the learner’s preparation. A short conversation allows those expectations to be corrected before patient care is underway.

Everyone should leave the introduction knowing what the learner may do, what requires direct supervision, what needs immediate escalation, and how faculty can be reached. Patient information should stay within communication methods approved by the program and facility. The next contact point should also be clear, whether that is a faculty visit, a scheduled call, a midpoint evaluation, or another check-in that fits the placement.

When the Clinical Instructor Is on Site

A faculty-led group clinical uses a different structure. The clinical instructor may hold the academic role and provide direct supervision while coordinating several learners, staff nurses, and patient assignments. The staff nurse working with a learner for the day may contribute observations and guide care within the unit workflow without serving as the learner’s formal preceptor. The instructor is present, but the work still depends on partnership with the unit. In one U.S. undergraduate clinical-education pilot, staff nurses emphasized collaboration, communication, and academic-faculty presence as supports for teaching and learning (Bowles et al., 2022).

Faculty presence in a group clinical includes making rounds, being available for required supervision, communicating with the nurse responsible for the patient, and helping the learner enter the work of the unit. The instructor cannot be physically beside several learners at the same time. Staff nurses should know how to reach the instructor and which activities require faculty involvement. Faculty should know when the unit’s workload, patient acuity, or staffing changes what is reasonable for the learner that day. Neither side should have to work from assumptions about what the other person already knows.

Neither side should have to work from assumptions about what the other person already knows.

Working Together After the Introduction

The first conversation gives everyone the same beginning. The placement itself requires continued communication. Faculty needs observations from the preceptor, and the preceptor needs faculty to respond. The learner needs both people to address concerns directly instead of asking them to carry messages back and forth.

Relationship management is the part of the Neuro-Emotive Framework that matters most here. Self-awareness helps faculty notice when they are becoming defensive about the program and helps the preceptor recognize when frustration from the shift is entering the teaching relationship. Social awareness helps each person understand the pressures the other one is carrying. Relationship skills turn that awareness into a clear question, a specific observation, or a request for support. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) and the American Organization for Nursing Leadership (AONL) describe academic-practice partnerships through clear expectations, mutual goals, trust, transparency, meaningful engagement, and shared accountability (AACN & AONL, 2025). Those ideas become practical when faculty answers the phone, the preceptor reports a concern early, and both people discuss what the learner needs next.

3 Key Takeaways for Nurse Educators

1. Faculty and preceptors need to understand the limits of each other’s roles. Faculty brings the academic expectations, evaluation process, and knowledge of the learner’s progression. The preceptor brings the live clinical environment and sustained observation of the learner’s performance. Clarify where those responsibilities meet and where local policy keeps them separate.
2. Preceptors need information they can use during the shift. Explain the learner’s level, goals, supervision needs, and current limits. Provide a direct contact route and tell the preceptor when you need to hear from them. Sending a packet is only one part of that communication.
3. Faculty needs specific observations early enough to act. Ask what the preceptor saw, when it happened, and what the learner did next. A concern raised during the placement creates room for coaching, clarification, and follow-up. A concern saved for the final evaluation leaves everyone with fewer options.

Conclusion

Before the first shift, the preceptor wants to know what the learner can do. Faculty needs to know what the preceptor will be able to observe and support. The learner needs to understand how to participate safely in both the academic and clinical sides of the experience.

None of those questions should be left for one person to answer alone. Faculty and clinical partners do different work, under different expectations, with different access to the placement. The relationship becomes workable when they share the information the other person cannot see and stay in contact after the introduction is over.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) & American Organization for Nursing Leadership (AONL). (2025). The guiding principles for academic-practice partnerships.

Benny, J., Porter, J. E., & Joseph, B. (2023). A systematic review of preceptor’s experience in supervising undergraduate nursing students: Lessons learned for mental health nursing. Nursing Open, 10(4), 2003–2014.

Bowles, W., Buck, J., Brinkman, B., Hixon, B., Guo, J., & Zehala, A. (2022). Academic-clinical nursing partnership use an evidence-based practice model. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 31(3–4), 335–346.

Jenkins-Arraf, K. A. (2026). Exploring perceived barriers and facilitating factors affecting nurse preceptors’ effectiveness: Key implications for nursing faculty and hospital administration. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 16(2), 8–16.